" Curtis was an extremely important political and
legal figure during the nineteenth century, yet he remarkably lacks
a serious biography. . . . Professor Streichler does a first-rate
job. No need exists for a further biography."
Mark Graber, University of Maryland, author of Transforming
Free Speech: The Ambiguous Legacy of Civil Libertarianism
"A graceful and rewarding study of jurisprudence-in-action,
making this one of those rare books that sits comfortably both in
the research library and on the nightstand. . . . A fascinating
story. Streichler's prose is fluid, and he is particularly
deft at explaining difficult legal concepts in plain English. Anyone
wishing to understand more about the transforming power of the Civil
War era on American constitutional thought and practice will benefit
from reading this book. . . . . A first-rate work on an important
figure."
H. Robert Baker, H-Net Reviews in the Humanities &
Social Sciences
"An excellent book. Professor Streichler writes with
a clarity and occasional wit not always found in academics' prose."
Robert J. Muldoon Jr., Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly
"Clear and engaging writing style. . . . A remarkable
grasp of the meaning and the implications of Curtis' own work."
Michael C. Berheide, Civil War Book Review
"Stuart Streichler has now provided a comprehensive,
readable, and sympathetic biography of Justice Curtis that masterfully
fills that gap and hopefully will bring new attention to this important
nineteenth-century figure."
"Although best remembered for his famous dissent in Dred Scott,
Curtis had a long and complicated career debating the meaning and
implications of the Constitution, and Streichler provides a welcome
introduction to those debates and Curtis's role in them."
Keith E. Whittington, Register of the Kentucky Historical
Society
|
Justice Curtis in
the Civil War Era:
At the Crossroads of American Constitutionalism |
| |
| Stuart Streichler |
| 304 pages, 6 1/8 x 9 1/4 |
| Cloth ISBN 0-8139-2342-5 $37.50 |
| Constitutionalism
and Democracy |
 |
During a career as both a lawyer and a Supreme Court justice,
Benjamin R. Curtis addressed practically every major constitutional
question of the mid-nineteenth century, making judgments that
still resonate in American law. Aside from a family memoir written
by his brother over one hundred years ago, however, no book-length
treatment of Curtis exists. Now Stuart Streichler has filled this
gap in judicial biography, using Curtis’s life and work
as a window on the most serious constitutional crisis in American
history, the Civil War.
Curtis was the lead attorney for President Andrew Johnson in
the Senate’s impeachment trial, where he delivered the pivotal
argument, and his was an influential voice in the pervasive constitutional
struggle between states and the federal government. He is best
remembered, however, for dissenting in the Dred Scott case, in
which he disputed Chief Justice Taney’s proslavery ruling
that no black person could ever become a citizen of the United
States. In the wake of the decision, Curtis resigned from the
court, the only justice in the Supreme Court’s history to
do so on grounds of principle. Yet he also clashed with Boston’s
abolitionists over enforcing the Fugitive Slave Act, and he opposed
the Emancipation Proclamation.
In a period when the Constitution was radically transformed from
a charter that protected slavery to one that granted all persons
equal rights of citizenship, Justice Curtis maintained his faith
in the Constitution as an adaptable instrument of self-government
and tried to mark out a path for gradual change. Streichler assesses
Curtis’s common-law methods in the context of his divisive
times and shows how the judge’s views continue to shed light
on issues that have become once again relevant, such as the presidential
impeachment process and, after 9/11, the use of military tribunals
to try civilians. .
Stuart Streichler is Fulbright Lecturer
in the Graduate School of Law and the Department of American Studies
at Tohoku University, Japan.
|