
Remaking Custom
History has largely forgotten the writings, both public and private, of early nineteenth-century America’s legal scholars. However, Ellen Holmes Pearson argues that the observers from this era had a unique perspective on the young nation and the directions in which its legal culture might go.
Remaking Custom draws on the law lectures, treatises, speeches, and papers of the early republic’s legal scholars to examine the critical role that they played in the formation of American identities. As intermediaries between the founders of America’s newly independent polities and the next generation of legal practitioners and political leaders, the nation’s law educators expressed pride in the retention of the "republican parts" of England’s common law while at the same time identifying some of the central features that distinguished American law from that of Britain. From their perspective, the new nation’s blending of tradition and innovation produced a superior national character.
Because American law educators interpreted both local and national legal trends, Remaking Custom reveals how national identities developed through Americans’ articulation of their local customs and identities. Pearson examines the innovations that legists could celebrate, such as constitutional changes that placed the people at the center of their governments and more egalitarian property laws that accompanied America’s abundant supply of land. The book also deals with innovations that presented uncomfortable challenges to law educators as they sought creative ways to justify the legal cultures that grew up around slavery and Anglo-Americans’ hunger for land occupied by Native Americans.
- Mary Sarah Bilder, Boston College School of Law, author of The Transatlantic Constitution: Colonial Legal Culture and the EmpireA fascinating book. The effort to describe and analyze how early nineteenth-century American legal writers understood American law is noteworthy and important. Pearson is a sympathetic and careful reader of this remarkable outpouring of American legal literature. Remaking Custom will likely restore to these often forgotten writers the reputation they once deservedly had.
- Journal of the Early RepublicRemaking Custom provides an interesting perspective on the development of American national identity in the formative era. It does so not only because it approaches this question from the hitherto understudied direction of the law, but because Pearson necessarily takes a trans-Atlantic approach to the question of American identity. Because American law was embedded in English precedent, the development of a national legal culture compelled legist to tackle in a very practical way the question of national distinctiveness. It was one thing for the literati to call for a national literature, but it was quite another for legal authorities to decide how much, or whether, American law should integrate English precedent.
- The American Historical ReviewHolmes ably examines how America's early legal scholars gradually established an American legal identity through their lectures and writings.
- The Journal of American HistoryPearson is convincing in her argument that the law professors and legal writers of the early American republic were able simultaneously to emphasize local diversity while positing and, indeed, crafting a more singular American legal culture. In studying how legal scholars shaped perceptions of the common law, Pearson has discovered much about how postrevolutionary Americans were beginning to perceive themselves.
Ellen Holmes Pearson is Professor of History at the University of North Carolina, Asheville.

